Legislature(2013 - 2014)
2014-03-13 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2014-03-13 House Journal Page 1883 HB 266 The following, which was advanced to third reading from the March 12, 2014, calendar (page 1851), was read the third time: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 266(FIN) "An Act making appropriations for the operating and loan program expenses of state government and for certain programs, capitalizing funds, and making reappropriations; and providing for an effective date." Representative Gara moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 266(FIN) be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 1. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The Speaker stated that, without objection, CSHB 266(FIN) would be returned to second reading for all amendments. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representatives Gara, Kito III, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kreiss-Tomkins, Tarr, Tuck, and Guttenberg: Page 61, line 16: Delete "25,000,001" Insert "126,000,001" Representative Gara moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. 2014-03-13 House Journal Page 1884 Representative T. Wilson objected. Representative Lynn moved and asked unanimous consent that he be allowed to abstain from voting because of a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and Representative Lynn was required to vote. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 29 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito III, Kreiss-Tomkins, Tarr, Tuck Nays: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Edgmon, Feige, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Higgins, Holmes, Hughes, Isaacson, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Excused: Drummond Absent: Reinbold And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representatives Josephson, Kito III, Kawasaki, Kreiss-Tomkins, Tarr, Gara, Tuck, and Guttenberg: Page 11, line 4: Delete "237,167,600" Insert "239,167,600" Delete "29,687,700" Insert "31,687,700" Page 11, line 17: Delete "2,000,000" Insert "4,000,000" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. 2014-03-13 House Journal Page 1885 Representative Josephson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative T. Wilson objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 30 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito III, Kreiss-Tomkins, Tarr, Tuck Nays: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Edgmon, Feige, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Higgins, Holmes, Hughes, Isaacson, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Excused: Drummond And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representatives Kito III, Kreiss- Tomkins, Tuck, Kawasaki, Josephson, Gara, and Guttenberg: Page 22, line 29: Delete "35,033,200" Insert "37,424,900" Delete "17,071,800" Insert "19,463,500" Page 22, line 31: Delete "25,955,500" Insert "28,347,200" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Kito III moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. 2014-03-13 House Journal Page 1886 Representative T. Wilson objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 10 NAYS: 29 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito III, Kreiss-Tomkins, Munoz, Tarr, Tuck Nays: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Edgmon, Feige, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Higgins, Holmes, Hughes, Isaacson, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Excused: Drummond And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Representative LeDoux moved and asked unanimous consent that she be allowed to abstain from voting because of a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and Representative LeDoux was required to vote. Amendment No. 4 was offered by Representatives Guttenberg, Kito III, Josephson, Kawasaki, Gara, Tarr, and Tuck: Page 36, line 24: Delete "912,641,000" Insert "924,614,500" Delete "676,935,500" Insert "688,909,000" Page 37, line 10: Delete "-17,347,100" Insert "-5,373,600" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. 2014-03-13 House Journal Page 1887 Representative Guttenberg moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 4 be adopted. Representative Munoz objected. Representative Pruitt moved and asked unanimous consent that Representative Gruenberg be excused from a call of the House. There being no objection, it was so ordered. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 30 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Gara, Guttenberg, Isaacson, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito III, Tarr, Tuck Nays: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Edgmon, Feige, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Higgins, Holmes, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Excused: Drummond, Gruenberg And so, Amendment No. 4 was not adopted. Amendment No. 5 was offered by Representatives Guttenberg, Kito III, Tuck, Josephson, Kawasaki, Gara, and Tarr: Page 36, line 24: Delete "912,641,000" Insert "913,368,900" Delete "676,935,500" Insert "677,588,400" Delete "235,705,500" Insert "235,780,500" 2014-03-13 House Journal Page 1888 Page 37, line 17: Delete "277,938,000" Insert "278,665,900" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Guttenberg moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 5 be adopted. Representative Munoz objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 31 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Gara, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito III, Tarr, Tuck Nays: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Edgmon, Feige, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Higgins, Holmes, Hughes, Isaacson, Johnson, Keller, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Excused: Drummond, Gruenberg And so, Amendment No. 5 was not adopted. Amendment No. 6 was offered by Representatives Tarr, Kito III, Kawasaki, Gara, Kreiss-Tomkins, Tuck, and Josephson: Page 16, line 11: Delete "52,846,000" Insert "54,889,000" Delete "11,918,000" Insert "13,961,000" Page 16, line 16: Delete "5,664,300" Insert "7,707,300" 2014-03-13 House Journal Page 1889 Page 16, following line 16: Insert "It is the intent of the legislature that the Department of Health and Social Services continue to fund residential substance abuse treatment services at least at the fiscal year 2014 level." Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Tarr moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 6 be adopted. Representative Neuman objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 6 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 6 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 29 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Gara, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito III, Kreiss-Tomkins, Nageak, Tarr, Tuck Nays: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Edgmon, Feige, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Higgins, Holmes, Hughes, Isaacson, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Excused: Drummond, Gruenberg And so, Amendment No. 6 was not adopted. Amendment No. 7 was offered by Representatives Guttenberg, Kito III, Kawasaki, Tuck, Josephson, Gara, and Tarr: Page 19, line 20: Delete "45,519,300" Insert "45,844,300" Delete "25,939,600" Insert "26,264,600" 2014-03-13 House Journal Page 1890 Page 19, line 25: Delete "11,555,800" Insert "11,880,800" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Guttenberg moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 7 be adopted. Representative Neuman objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 7 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 7 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 31 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Gara, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito III, Tarr, Tuck Nays: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Edgmon, Feige, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Higgins, Holmes, Hughes, Isaacson, Johnson, Keller, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Excused: Drummond, Gruenberg And so, Amendment No. 7 was not adopted. Amendment No. 8 was offered by Representatives Kawasaki, Kreiss- Tomkins, Gara, and Tuck: Page 40, following line 11: Insert "It is the intent of the legislature that Legislative Council sublease or lease, if feasible, that portion of the new Anchorage Legislative Office Building that exceeds, in square footage, the space the legislature leased at that building as of December 2012. Legislative Council may determine the most appropriate portions to lease. It is the intent of the legislature that no legislator's office in the new Anchorage Legislative Office Building be more than 30 percent 2014-03-13 House Journal Page 1891 larger than any other legislator's office, except that offices for a visiting legislator who has a primary interim legislative office nearer to the legislator's home community may be allotted a smaller space." Representative Kawasaki moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 8 be adopted. Representative Hawker objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 8 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 8 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 31 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Gara, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kreiss-Tomkins, Tarr, Tuck Nays: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Edgmon, Feige, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Higgins, Holmes, Hughes, Isaacson, Johnson, Keller, Kito III, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Excused: Drummond, Gruenberg And so, Amendment No. 8 was not adopted. Amendment No. 9 was offered by Representatives Gara, Kito III, Kawasaki, Kreiss-Tomkins, and Tuck: Page 24, line 21: Delete "29,800,600" Insert "30,900,600" Delete "25,628,900" Insert "24,528,900" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. 2014-03-13 House Journal Page 1892 Representative Gara moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 9 be adopted. Representative Holmes objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 9 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 9 YEAS: 8 NAYS: 29 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Gara, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito III, Kreiss-Tomkins, Tarr, Tuck Nays: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Edgmon, Feige, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Holmes, Hughes, Isaacson, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Excused: Drummond, Gruenberg Absent: Higgins And so, Amendment No. 9 was not adopted. Amendment No. 10 was not offered. Amendment No. 11 was offered by Representatives Kawasaki, Gara, Kito III, Kreiss-Tomkins, and Josephson: Page 26, line 12: Delete "10,125,500" Insert "8,125,500" Delete "6,084,300" Insert "4,084,300" Page 26, line 16: Delete "4,062,600" Insert "2,062,600" 2014-03-13 House Journal Page 1893 Page 26, following line 20: Insert "It is the intent of the legislature that the Kodiak Launch Complex be maintained and that management seek additional launch contracts or a buyer for the facility." Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Kawasaki moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 11 be adopted. Representative Thompson objected. Representatives Reinbold and Guttenberg moved and asked unanimous consent that they be allowed to abstain from voting because of a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and the members were required to vote. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 11 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 11 YEAS: 6 NAYS: 32 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Gara, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito III, Kreiss-Tomkins, Tarr Nays: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Edgmon, Feige, Foster, Gattis, Guttenberg, Hawker, Herron, Higgins, Holmes, Hughes, Isaacson, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thompson, Tuck, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Excused: Drummond, Gruenberg And so, Amendment No. 11 was not adopted. Amendment No. 12 was offered by Representatives Josephson, Kreiss- Tomkins, Kito III, Tuck, Gara, and Tarr: 2014-03-13 House Journal Page 1894 Page 7, line 16: Delete "5,372,400" in both places Insert "4,881,326" in both places Page 7, line 17: Delete "5,372,400" Insert "4,881,326" Page 7, following line 18: Insert "It is the intent of the legislature that the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation reduce by a total of $491,074, if feasible, the salaries of each of the eight employees earning more than $175,000, not including benefits." Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Josephson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 12 be adopted. Representative Costello objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 12 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 266(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 12 YEAS: 7 NAYS: 30 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Gara, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kito III, Kreiss-Tomkins, Tarr, Tuck Nays: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Edgmon, Feige, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Higgins, Holmes, Hughes, Isaacson, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Excused: Drummond, Gruenberg Absent: Kawasaki And so, Amendment No. 12 was not adopted. 2014-03-13 House Journal Page 1895 CSHB 266(FIN) was automatically in third reading. Representatives Herron, Hughes, and Pruitt moved and asked unanimous consent that they be allowed to abstain from voting because of a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and the members were required to vote. The question being: "Shall CSHB 266(FIN) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 266(FIN) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 32 NAYS: 6 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Austerman, Chenault, Costello, Edgmon, Feige, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Higgins, Holmes, Hughes, Isaacson, Johnson, Keller, Kito III, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Nageak, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stoltze, Thompson, P.Wilson, T.Wilson Nays: Gara, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Tarr, Tuck Excused: Drummond, Gruenberg And so, CSHB 266(FIN) passed the House. Representative Pruitt moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 266(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.